Your app worked in the demo. Then you got 100 real users. We're the engineering team that diagnoses what's about to break, and ships the smallest move that gets you past your next wall. Whether you built on Bubble, Cursor, v0, or in-house.
“He was confident enough to challenge my original approach. He proposed a more scalable stack than I had requested and explained the trade-offs clearly.”
We've seen each of these dozens of times. None of them require a rebuild on the first move.
Your AI tool shipped a working demo in a day. Then came auth that actually holds, payments that reconcile, and data that doesn't leak — and every new prompt makes a different part of the app break.
Buttons stop responding. Data stops saving. Deployment fails. You're burning credits while the agent loops on the same error and reintroduces last week's bug. The cost of one more 'just fix it' prompt is no longer obvious.
You showed the codebase to engineers and watched them flinch. Each one wanted to start over. None of them told you why, exactly, or which parts were actually worth keeping. You don't know if it's true or an upsell.
Tea, Moltbook — the vibe-coded data leaks keep landing in the headlines. You shipped fast — but nobody set up row-level security, rotated the keys in the client bundle, or audited the privacy rules. Now you're processing real users and you can't tell what's exposed.
Fixed prices, scoped against the actual problem — not packaged to push you up to the next tier. We ship all four outcomes, so the verdict isn't biased toward the most expensive one.
One senior engineer reads your app end to end. You get a written diagnosis and the honest answer: keep, fix, rebuild, or retire.
You get the report and the ranked risk list, and we part ways. Nothing else to buy.
When the substrate isn't the problem and a rebuild is overkill. We take what's there and ship it to production — fixed scope, fixed price, same engineer through to handover.
When the substrate is the wall. We move you to a stack a senior engineer would actually pick — Next.js + TypeScript + Postgres, typed end to end. Users migrated, no downtime, price fixed from the audit.
Sometimes the right call is to stop. We put it in writing before you spend another dollar.
Retainers run $3–$8K/m for new accounts.
Every engagement starts with the audit. We don't recommend a fix or a rebuild before we've actually looked at your app.
24 to 48 hours end to end. You don't need to be on a call for any of it.
You send us a read-only login, a repo invite, and the URL. Mutual NDA is signed before we open the first file.
24 to 48 hours. One engineer in your app, end to end. Database, hot paths, error logs, payment flows, anything AI is touching.
A written document, three to six pages. A Loom that walks the document in your codebase. Ranked risks, smallest moves, an honest call on rebuild.
Patch with us, patch with anyone, do nothing, or rebuild. The audit is yours. Most of our sprints start a week or two later.
No call required. No pitch deck. Async by default.
Greenfield builds on real code, AI codebase rescues, and apps we kept on Bubble after the audit. A sample of what we've shipped.
Inherited a broken AI-generated codebase. We fixed it in place — multi-currency Stripe wired correctly, the content backend stabilised, both web and React Native shipped to production without a rebuild.
Built end-to-end on Bubble in 6 weeks. $10K revenue in week one, 4.9/5 user rating. Bubble was the right call for the stage — and the app still runs on it today.
Serious Bubble teams move off Bubble without a fragile cutover. We audit the workflows, plan the data migration, and ship the Next.js + Postgres replacement — users intact, business uninterrupted.
“Thorough technical investigation that uncovered serious issues I had no visibility into — including a security vulnerability he verified with evidence. The recommended paths were scoped with honest trade-offs. No upselling, no pressure.”
“He was confident enough to challenge my original approach. He proposed a more scalable stack than I had requested, explained the trade-offs clearly, and made recommendations grounded in long-term maintainability — not quick fixes.”
“Muzammil has been a reliable and flexible partner through various phases of our business growth. His technical skills and responsiveness have made him an integral part of our extended team.”
One senior engineer reads your app end to end — codebase, data model, hot paths, third-party integrations. You get a written report plus a Loom walkthrough, usually within 48 hours. The report names the three or four things most likely to break next, ranks them by blast radius, and tells you the smallest move that resolves each. Every audit ends in one of four answers: keep, fix, rebuild, or retire. If the report isn't worth what you paid, we refund it.
No. We work with Bubble, Cursor, v0, Webflow, FlutterFlow, in-house React, Next.js, and most stacks built in the last three years. The bottlenecks rhyme regardless of substrate — the audit names them in your stack's vocabulary, not ours.
That happens. JunoInsure has been on Bubble for 2.5 years on our recommendation. Nola is still on Bubble after our audit. We don't sell rebuilds we don't think you need. If the right move is a Fix Sprint or staying put, that's what the report says — and that's what we'll quote.
You give us access. We hand back a written diagnosis and the honest verdict. You decide what happens next.